Lawmakers are coming to grips with so-called “revenge porn,” as Liz Halloran reports for NPR, which means they’re looking for ways to criminalize it. After all, there probably should be a way to discourage a spouse or lover – usually a former spouse or lover – from posting images or videos of you online without your consent.
But as we’re coming to find, laws that attempt to criminalize revenge porn in the name of safeguarding privacy run up against First Amendment free speech protections.
What Is Revenge Porn?.
Revenge porn, according to Wikipedia, is “typically uploaded by ex-partners or hackers” and is published online without the consent of the person depicted. You could argue against allowing a partner from photographing or recording in the first place, but “selfies” and hidden cameras make that argument moot.
Regardless of the circumstances under which the sexual content is created, the act of publishing it online – often with accompanying personal details like names, employers, and links to social media profiles – is why revenge porn has lately been the target of lawmakers across the nation.
Examples of Revenge Porn Laws.
Halloran quotes a lawyer with the American Civil Liberties Union: “[T]he reality is that revenge porn laws tend to criminalize the sharing of nude images that people lawfully own. That treads on very thin ice constitutionally.”
The ice may be thin, but that doesn’t mean lawmakers aren’t trying.
California and New Jersey are apparently the only two states that have passed revenge porn laws – for now. Halloran writes that there are “bills in the pipeline” in state legislatures across the country.
These laws and bills differ in scope and manner of punishment. Some make revenge porn a misdemeanor; others, a felony. Some bills probably go too far. For example, Halloran cites an Arizona bill that would make it a crime if you get an unsolicited text and show the image to a friend.
Then, of course, there’s the free speech issue. According to the ACLU lawyer, “[T]here simply isn’t another example I’m aware of where there are criminal penalties for sharing otherwise lawful speech.”
Revenge Porn: The Next Sex Crime?.
Israel is apparently the first country to have made revenge porn a bona fide sex crime. As Sam Frizell reports for TIME, government officials in that country characterized some types of revenge porn as “virtual rape.”
“We are witnessing more and more cases of sexual assaults that were filmed and distributed in public without restraints and without limits; this legislative intervention is necessary and will help fight the shocking phenomenon of ‘virtual rape,’” according to Yifat Kariv.
Will the U.S. follow suit and make revenge porn a sex crime?
We are likely to see a variety of approaches – as we have already seen – as each state works to criminalize revenge porn, but lawmakers will be required to create bills that can withstand constitutional scrutiny under the First Amendment in addition to considering the rights of those who may be accused.
This is because the accusation of any behavior that has been classified as a sex crime has the potential to ruin a person’s life.
As we’ve already seen with the Adam Walsh Child Protection and Safety Act, which, among other things, created the sex offender registry, the criminalization of sex offenses can go too far. The activist Patty Wetterling, in the years following her son’s abduction, once played a major role in the creation of this law, but in the years since, Wetterling has publically criticized the law for its overreach.
We should be careful to safeguard liberty against overreaching and intrusive criminal laws – as much as we are careful to safeguard the privacy and free speech – as the states continue to grapple with revenge porn.
About the Author: Criminal Defense Attorney Marcilliat & Mills PLLC.
This informational article was provided by KevinMarcilliat, the founder of Marcilliat & Mills PLLC, a North Carolina criminal defense law firm. With offices in Wilmington, Raleigh, and Charlotte, our defense attorneys handle state and federal sex offense cases throughout North Carolina. Contact our Raleigh office today online or call 919-838-6643 for a free consultation.
State v. B.S.: Not Guilty Verdict in First Degree Murder Case.
In this case, our client was charged with First Degree Murder in connection with a “drive-by” shooting that occurred in Charlotte, NC. The State’s evidence included GPS ankle monitoring data linking our client was at the scene of the crime and evidence that our client confessed to an inmate while in jail. Nonetheless, we convinced a jury to unanimously find our client Not Guilty. He was released from jail the same day.
State v. S.G.: First Degree Murder Charge Dismissed..
Our client was charged with First Degree for the shooting death related to an alleged breaking and entering. The State’s evidence included a co-defendant alleging that our client was the shooter. After conducting a thorough investigation with the use of a private investigator, we persuaded the State to dismiss entirely the case against our client.
State v. B.D.: First Degree Murder Charged Dismissed..
After conducting an investigation and communicating with prosecutor about the facts and circumstances indicating that our client acted in self-defense, the case was dismissed and deemed a justifiable homicide.
State v. I.R.: Reduction from First Degree Murder to Involuntary Manslaughter and Concealment of Death..
Our client was charged with the First Degree Murder of a young lady by drug overdose. After investigating the decedent’s background and hiring a preeminent expert toxicologist to fight the State’s theory of death, we were able to negotiate this case down from Life in prison to 5 years in prison, with credit for time served.
State v. J.G.: .
Our client was charged with First Degree Murder related to a “drug deal gone bad.” After engaging the services of a private investigator and noting issues with the State’s case, we were able to negotiate a plea for our client that avoided a Life sentence and required him to serve only 12 years.