DISMISSALS
State v. J.A. – First Degree Rape
“The federal government has now put its thumb decisively on the scale against fairness on issues of sexual harassment and assault.”
– Wall Street Journal op-ed
As made clear by the paltry burden of proof in Title IX cases, students accused of sexual misconduct have two legal hurdles working against them:
Here’s how one Title IX case worked in the real world, below.
According to the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education:
“Cases like this vividly demonstrate the need for due process and fair procedure on campus, as well as a renewed recognition that fundamental rights are important for both victims and the accused.”
The fact that the student was so quickly found “guilty” by the school administration, as well as the fact that police charged the alleged victim with filing a false report yet it still took school administration a year and a half to change its position illustrates the problem.
If you’re facing any kind of disciplinary action under Title IX, don’t wait to get help.
State v. J.A. – First Degree Rape
State v. B.S. – First Degree Murder
State v. E.D. – Identity Theft
State v. J.A. – First Degree Rape
Each case is different and must be evaluated on its individual facts. We work hard to assess each case individually. Prior results do not guarantee any future outcome.
Put our team of criminal defense lawyers on your side today. You are one phone call or email away from getting your questions answered by an experienced defense attorney.
Call us at 919-838-6643to set up a free consultation or send us an email.
Fields marked with an * are required
Call 919-838-6643 to schedule a free initial consultation. Offices open weekdays 8am – 7pm, Saturdays 9am – 5pm
*AV®, AV Preeminent®, Martindale-Hubbell Distinguished and Martindale-Hubbell Notable are certification marks used under license in accordance with the Martindale-Hubbell certification procedures, standards and policies. Martindale-Hubbell® is the facilitator of a peer review rating process. Ratings reflect the anonymous opinions of members of the bar and the judiciary. Martindale-Hubbell® Peer Review Ratings™ fall into two categories — legal ability and general ethical standards.
© 2024 Marcilliat & Mills PLLC. All Rights Reserved.
Disclaimer | Site Map | Privacy Policy |